The Askers & the Asked.

In this world of constant connectivity and information sharing, I can never believe how little some people know about the people they are friends with.

Recently, I was visiting a friend who I hadn’t seen in a while. Upon returning to her apartment to watch something called TLC as after-dinner entertainment (when it comes to TV, I’m basically a luddite, and after being exposed to TLC I know why), we ran into some of her close friends who live in her building. They were interesting in an exemplary way that transcends my propensity to find everyone interesting – one recently having moved to New York from Oregon, one an accomplished sculptor, one an aspiring rapper (who I was particularly excited about, seeing as I’ve had little occasion to mingle with aspiring rappers).

In the twenty minutes that we loitered in front of the building talking, I found myself playing my usual role in most conversations — that of the inquirer. Asking questions of, “Where in Oregon? Book Soup? That place is my favorite! You volunteered with Dave Eggers’ writing program? I love Assassination Vacation, too!”

When we disengaged and headed upstairs, I continued asking my friend some of the questions I hadn’t gotten a chance to ask her friends: How long had Oregon been in Manhattan? Did she like it, or did she miss the west coast? And what about rapper? Did he have a manager or contract? Did he rap solo or with a posse? Did the sculptor show in galleries or sell independently? Had he gone to school for art, or just struck out on his own with talent in place of training?

My friend knew the answer to exactly none of these questions, and furthermore acted as if it had genuinely never crossed her mind to ask. How long had she been friends with these people, you want to know? Years. They are over at one another’s apartments nearly every night. They eat together, drink together, share confidences about sex/drugs/rock and roll, watch each others’ pets when they go out of town. And yet my friend didn’t even know if Oregon was happy in New York, if the benefit outweighed the cost, if she was ever homesick. Didn’t know how the rapper made a living basic enough to live in her building. Didn’t know how the artist proceeded after she completed a work and put the paintbrush down.

Mind you, this was no revelation to me. Many, nary most, of the people we interact with on a daily basis don’t entertain proactive curiosities about the people in front of them. It’s evident in a million ways – the way the some people will have a better conversation with their iPhone that they will with you when you’re sitting right in front of them, the frequency with which lazy queries like, “Really?” are dropped with divided attention, the hurtful blank looks you get back when you’ve shared something you care about with someone you are willing to reveal yourself to.

I don’t want to regress and get bogged down in a conversation of social media and its bi-product – rampant self-interest – because I’ve already been down that road on this URL before. Do I think that contributes to the fact that people show little genuine interest in one another? Of course I do. But I think mainly that curiosity in general is suffering, and if you can’t wonder about what event will do humanity in or the hundreds of stories an airplane holds as it hurdles through the blue, how can you care about where a single person is from or who they really are?

There’s no excuse for being lazy in our attention to others. It’s a choice, not an inherited trait, and a particularly unflattering choice at that. Everyone has to tune out the churning rapids of information output to stay sane and drown out naysayers to preserve perspective, but when it comes to intimate interaction with people who mean you no harm, listening costs very little. For me, this kind of listening has provided some of my most welcome surprises and vitamin-packed food for thought. I bet the people who are the subjects of those amazing stories on This American Life probably have many friends who would tune in mid-broadcast having never heard the story and having no clue that they even knew the person whose voice emanated from their speakers.

Me writing about this is admittedly somewhat absurd given that I’m not an extroverted social connector by any stretch of the imagination. I don’t actively engage people who sit down next to me at Starbucks. Don’t share gripes with the people standing next to me in the checkout line. Don’t ask the pest control man his life story. But for whatever reason, I seem to be on the receiving end of these engagements constantly. Probably because I give off the vibe of being the type of person who will be too meek/mild/polite to disengage you once you crank up the engine. But I’m usually annoyed as hell when someone plops down next to me and starts talking as I’m taking my first sips of coffee and re-immersing myself in the wonky world of David McCullogh’s accounting of Lewis & Clark. People can be invasive and intrusive. Trust me, I get it. Woe be unto whoever prevents me from peacefully enjoying my morning routine of NPR, caffeine, and half-hearted attempts at crosswords. But the bottom line is that what I hear as a result of these raids on my solitude often ends up trumping my initial inner rage blackout. Often, but not always.

But the object of this post was not really strangers at coffee shops, but the people we call friends, those with whom we have relationships. And I don’t think the meaningful kind of sharing should come at the drop of a hat. I am a big, big fan of the concept of gradual revelation as reward. As in the greatest gift any person can give to any other person is an honest attempt to express who they are, little by little, conversation by conversation. And talking about boyfriends and bands can be part of that. But, as was proven by my friend, it certainly can’t give you a rounded impression of who someone is and what drives them.

This little rant was initially aimed at a single selfish point: I’m getting tired of always being the one doing the asking and rarely the one being asked when it comes to my relationships with other people. Of those loose group of friends we tend to count off in multiples of ten, I can count those amongst them who are Askers on one hand and not even use all the fingers. What people say about being lucky if you have two or three deeply entrenched, life-giving friendships is true. And I’ll bet if you think about who you enjoy these strong relationships with, you’ll land on those friends who are as curious about you as you are about them. Not that you should only be curious if your curiosity is going to beget someone else’s interest in you. True curiosity is its own reward. And yet.

Perhaps many relationships are bound to be frustrating or lacking for the people who are curious about everyone and everything everywhere, who want more than anything to discover the things that make others tick (thereby finding new reasons to tick themselves). But it still makes me sad, and it still frustrates me. There’s nothing more maddening than choosing to constantly offering up little parts of yourself to people who will never understand what they’re receiving, all the while knowing you have no one to blame for doing so but yourself.

It becomes apparent that any relationship truly worth having requires a person to be not just willing, but desirous of being both the Asker and the Asked in equal measure, forever.

This story has no moral, and I don’t have any suggestions for improving the situation. If I were Roald Dahl, I could probably weave this into a timeless, poignant story full of teachable moments humorously delivered by a crotchety old man. But the fact remains that I am me, markedly less gifted than Roald, and only moved to comment on something like this when it has been pressing on me and disturbing my own life.

So I guess I’ll wrap up by simply saying this, both to you, intangible reader, and to myself: There will be an ever-increasing parade of people who would rather stare at their phones or gripe about their sex lives than actually engage with another human being in a way that passes muster with the Askers. But that doesn’t mean you should stop asking. And for God’s sake, whatever you do, don’t lose sight of those rare moments when you opened your mouth to ask only to find that a question was already being asked of you.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Don’t trade in your tic-tac box…

I had the privilege of spending two hours sitting in front of Brandi Carlile on Saturday at the Ponte Vedra Concert Hall in Jacksonville, Florida. I had been dying to see her in concert forever, but I missed her the last time she was in New York and I (unfortunately) don’t reside in the Pacific Northwest where I would enjoy far more ease of access to many of the musicians I enjoy. So when I heard she was touring in my parents’ town, I decided to go to extreme measures and board a plane.

The thing I most cherish about Brandi’s music, aside from her powerful, perfectly craggy voice and stellar strumming skills is her lyricism. She so often touches on themes that are under-addressed in modern music, even amongst alternative gurus (whoever they are these days – I’m sure I don’t know). One of her most frequent themes is that of the value of childhood, the anger that is left in its wake, and our need to embrace our former wonderment in order to lead more fulfilling lives. So here’s to that.

Tagged , , ,

Beautiful Abandonment

My love of history was originally born of a love of eerie abandoned buildings, which, of course, stemmed from my love of Halloween. My parents (ruefully) encouraged this interest when I was a kid by finding some great abandoned haunts for me to enjoy on every vacation (my 12th birthday present was the underground tour of Seattle).

Now that I’m an adult, I’ve given these interests up.

Not. They’ve intensified (I spent much of this past winter roaming through the very best of abandoned Scotland). So much so that my first job out of college was with the New-York Historical Society, where I had ample opportunity to explore the underbelly of New York City history. Including, of course, some of the city’s greatest structural ghost towns.

The greatest discovery I made was a new opportunity to view – get this – an underground, abandoned historic fantasy land. The century-old City Hall subway station in lower Manhattan was closed in 1945 due to lagging use, but restored in the 1990s as part of a plan to turn it into an extension exhibit of the NY Transit Museum.

Though this plan never came to fruition, a change in route for the 6 train made visitation possible regardless. Prior to 2010, 6 train riders were forced to disembark before the train made the loop back uptown — a loop that take you right through the heart of the abandoned City Hall station. But as of today, riders can stay on the train as it whizzes back in time.

So if you’re ever in New York, and you want to do something truly different, climb on the downtown 6 and don’t get off at the Brooklyn Bridge. Stay aboard, and keep your eyes peeled…

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

And why wasn’t that enough?

“For a while she was enchanted by those who proposed that God was in nature, was all around us, was the accumulated natural world. ‘God,’ they would suggest, ‘is in all living things. God is beauty, God is in the long grass and the foam finishing a waterfall.’ That sort of thing. She liked that idea, God being in things that she could see, because she liked seeing things and wanted to believe in these things that she loved looking at — loved the notion that it was all here and easily observable, with one’s eyes being in some way the clergy, the connection between God and –

But a single contained God implied or insisted upon a hierarchy that she didn’t accept. God gave way to a system of extremes, and implied choices, and choices required separations, divisions, subtle condemnations. She was not ready to choose one God, so there would not be this sort of god in her world, and thus the transcendental deity –

But then why God at all? The oil-wet water was not God. It was not the least bit spiritual. It was oil-wet water, and it felt perfect when she put her hand into it, and it kissed her palm again and again, would never stop kissing her palm and why wasn’t that enough?”

- Dave Eggers, How We Are Hungry

Tagged , , , , ,

A New Defensive Strategy

In light of the impending Super Bowl, I thought it only fitting to offer a strategic suggestion to Tom Coughlin now rather than later, especially given the Patriots’ questionable defensive abilities.

Like all good plays, this one needs some preliminary deconstruction…

I have, as of late, been dealing regularly with a person who is perpetually lobbing absurd accusations, challenges, and insults at people in order to cast shadows of doubt over their characters and force them into spewing claims of their own legitimacy with the level head of a banshee.

Like all casual watchers of football, this person immediately jumps to the easy conclusion that the offense is the sexy side of the game to be on. And maybe it is. This, admittedly, isn’t chess – the offense and defense are not one and the same. You have to pick a preference, and the quarterback gets all the positive attention, right? But in life as in football: sexy fades, but high horses are immortal.

To this person, always being on the offensive means always having some sort of inestimable moral upper hand. They realize that those on the defense, in their frenetic attempts to steer themselves out from under a pall of accusations, however absurd, will come across as guilty as charged and possibly demented.

There is only one way to regain the high ground when dealing with these sort of piously psychotic quarterbacks, and unfortunately it’s a play that coaches fail to identify:

You have to let the offensive assholes play out their game without giving it credence.

In doing so, you ensure its futility. Sure, you have to protect yourself from fatal blows, but in order to regain control, you have to turn their strategy on its head and make it your own. You don’t do this by mimicking their tactics and shadowing their every move; you do it by making sure their strategy has the opposite of its intended outcome — making you do the dance of defensive desperation.

They want you to look bad, plain and simple. They want you to look like you’re scrambling at every turn just to meet their glorious challenges with less flattering grunts and shoves.

DON’T DO IT. 

Don’t attempt to prove the worth of your uniform by meeting the challenges asked of you while never issuing your own.

Ensure your basic protection, and then ignore that shit and do your own thing!

Appear to meet their initial punt and then go plop down with a sandwich on the 50 yard line!

They’ll be so thrown off by your apathetic behavior that the rest of the team will have a chance to reveal the fatal pitfall of the offense — overblown ego — within seconds. No one looks more f**king ridiculous than someone who goes hard and lobs an attack on a dude who just wants to munch his Po’ boy.

And for God’s sake, don’t save this strategy for your safety. Send your defensive tackle onto that battlefield with a BLT, and shut that shit down before it’s even begun.

I hereby guarantee the efficacy of this strategy…are you listening, Tom?

But more importantly for we New Yorkers…

Even on the off chance that you don’t take home the ultimate prize, you still had one hell of a sandwich.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

People vs. Humans


vs.

While walking to Rockefeller Center a few nights ago to marvel at this year’s tree and ransack the books on sale at Anthropologie, I had the good fortune of enjoying the company of one of my most valued friends with whom I always enjoy some of my most thoughtful, hilarious, nonsensical, and bizarre conversations. After nodding an afterthought goodbye to the tree as we griped about the absurdity of some of the people we know, we made the mistake of walking towards home through Times Square. As we waited for the walk sign to cross Sixth Avenue, I stared in abject horror at the mob of people and said, “I don’t know how I sustain desire to live here when I hate people so much.” And my friend, always tuned to the same obscure channel on which my brain operates, immediately responded, “Because you love humanity more than you hate people.”

A truer and more contradictory statement is rarely uttered. The more exposure I have to people (even New Yorkers, all of whom I hold to a high standard and generally derive great pleasure from), the more I am appalled by them…including, often, myself.

This day and age does nothing for our likability, let’s be honest. Not that it’s really the fault of the 21st Century or Steve Jobs or Al Gore when he invented the internet. But those things don’t help. I don’t notice the same things when I look at people that I used to notice. At one time, I was set on autopilot to observe the quirky, admirable traits people don’t even realize they exude. Now my default is noticing the proliferation of annoying crap people are hyper-conscious in striving to affect.

Why, yes, I do actually see you there with your iPad nestled into a case that mimicks an Edwardian first edition, flicking at warp speeds through your Mother Jones articles while covertly (or not-so-covertly, as it happens) monitoring the level of interest in your said behavior from fellow members of the 1 train community.

And, believe it not, I am not mesmerized by your purposefully audible conversation about farm subsidization and Scandinavian design trends as I sip my overpriced drink at Starbucks. Actually, I would be eternally grateful if you would shut the hell up so I can finish this story in my Roald Dahl book, okay? And no, I don’t care that you hold Roald Dahl in low esteem when compared with Maurice Sendak. “I understand what you’re saying, and your comments are valuable, but I’m gonna ignore your advice.” Do you know who said that, Mr. Ray Ban Readers? The Fantastic Mr. Fox. No, not Wes Anderson. Roald freaking Dahl!

People! They wear obnoxiously impractical underwear and assume ignorant positions on Asian affairs and look self-satisfied when loaded down with shopping bags and take themselves far too seriously and rely on cell phones to do basic math and use the word “like” as a glue to hold every thought together and talk badly about everyone they know to everyone else they know and smack gum too loudly and leave enough water in soap dishes to float the Titanic. People are mean and selfish and egocentric and rude and shallow and ignorant.

But, my oh, my…humans! They wait five extra seconds to hold doors and feel genuinely badly for babies who cry on airplanes and catch one another’s smiling eyes on the train when they overhear a person utter the same ridiculous comment and are homeless but can play violins as well as if they’d gone to Julliard and maybe they did and wear ugly but comfortable shoes and make childlike comments about holiday decorations and tell hopeful lies that they call resolutions. They are imperfect and get zits and are out-of-breath after grocery runs. And yet they are so beautiful and lovable and admirable.

There are so many people in New York City. Over eight million of them. Over eight million annoying, shallow, selfish, trend-following, rude, disheartening people.

But there are so many humans in New York City. Over eight million of them. Over eight million humans, getting though it the best they can in that beautifully flawed way, making the mistakes that all people do.

*Illustrations by Ms. Carson Ellis, an absolutely admirable human.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Random Thoughtlet

Twitter rarely makes me joyful or contemplative, but when I saw this, I smiled out loud. Not because I’m over the moon about the Kate Bush album (I do really like it, though), but because Ben Gibbard can now blithely proclaim such opinions without having to fully think through the implications upon, say, the holiday album of a certain Missus & Mister.

Not being married is the new marriage. That’s all I’m saying. I’ll take my ability to eat Blueberry Special K in my high school ballet leotard while watching Nova over picking out adorable Rifle Paper Co. wedding invitations emblazoned with woodland creatures any day of the weekend.

 

Tagged , , , , , ,

up/up/and away

I lifted the warped lid of my jewelry box just now and saw one of her business cards sitting right on top of my old turtle brooch.

“Why did you give me ten of these cards when you knew I already had your contact info?” I wish I’d asked her. But what would’ve been the point? I already know the answer.

It’s her rung.

It’s proof of where she is on the ladder she’s chosen to climb. And in handing those cards to me, she’s ensuring that I understand that in order to see me, she has to look down. Even though I’m three inches taller than she is. The pedestal is not measured by the length of our bones, but by what we grab onto and how tightly we hold it once we do.

What she doesn’t care to notice is that I’m even further down than she thought. I’m not even on her ladder, following in her footsteps, straining, climbing, knowing there will always be more people ahead than behind. Knowing that just because the ladder disappears into the clouds doesn’t mean it ever stops. Knowing that it connects directly with the sun itself, and by the time you’re aflame, you’re don’t climb down. You fall.

I’m so far below her, in fact, that she can’t even really see me. Because I’m still on the ground, craning my neck and shielding my eyes as I survey the millions of ladders soaring into the stratosphere like tin redwoods.

The people on the bottom rungs of the ladders are still distinct and clear enough that I can see them for who they are, or at the very least, most of who they are about to used to be. But as they climb higher, they all begin to look the same until they becomes indistinguishable and, then, one day disappear head-first.

There are not many people trained in climbing who have chosen to stay on the ground like me. Some did for a while but ultimately couldn’t stand the sight of the others going up without them, succumbing to the life-affirming fear of being left behind. Some only recently heaved a sigh twice their age and grabbed a rung at random, resigned to doing what it takes to avoid being an undefined unknown at a low altitude.

Sometimes I want to run amongst the ladders and grab at the new climbers on the bottom rungs and fling them back to earth just so I won’t be so alone here. But it would be pointless — the moment their palms start to chafe, they become determined to develop calluses. And after all, there are others who have chosen a sore neck over blistered hands, other who wander the dark and flickering maze of the forests floor. Sometime I think I see them, pausing in their journeys to glance skywards.  I can’t wait to finally find them, meet these people I know must be there. Nothing ever happens only once. Even me.

I don’t ever want a job that comes with a box of freshly-cut business cards. I don’t even want to make my own. There are enough people in this jungle looking to discover the view from the top. Not understanding that the view comes at a price. Because there are not many people above those clouds, and when you get all the way up there, you’re closest companion is going to be very, very far away.

Please don’t bother to look back down at me or laugh about how I’ve yet to take hold of it, of any of it. Because your view will always be a hastened downward glance to quantify your progress, and mine will always be a sweeping view of something so much larger than us both.

Tagged , , , , ,

A New Low

Today, Facebook made me type in the CAPTCHA “day, bovices” in order to post an article on my wall about watching episodes of Law & Order: SVU eight hundred times simply because you lack the modicum of decisiveness needed to make a decision about what to watch on Netflix instant streaming after perusing all of the main page suggestions for 21.7 minutes.

I don’t know what a day bovice is, let alone how it differs from a night bovice, but I’m pretty it sure it has something to do with me needing to get a life.

Tagged , ,

Turn the page and it is gone.

For the first 8 years of my life I operated under the assumption that those who sought careers in education did so as a result of a besotted fascination with the world, an incurable desire to extend their hunger for discovery to others. During years 9 through 12, I came to the conclusion that some exceptions existed, but only because some educators didn’t know how to hold age and wonderment in the same hand. That for these people, age got too big for fascination and bumped it right out of their grasps, leaving them clinging to a date on a driver’s license and the car that goes with it.

After the age of 12, I realized that age brought a loss of sight, and it was this astigmatism that debilitated the wonder, not the number itself. And at 23 I found out possibly the worst thing of all: Most people never suffered from acute fascination to begin with, and wouldn’t know wonder if it landed them in critical condition. If you see, really see, and think, really think, you’re going to sometimes feel like a very lonely person indeed. What’s more, if your wonder makes more minutes of lonely worthwhile than not, well, let’s just say you might as well go ahead and buy the one bedroom and save yourself the money lost on rent and waiting around.

I hate when people say, “I can’t believe this,” and, “I can’t believe that.” I believe everything because I have eyes and ears and a pulse and  therefore what’s not to believe? I can believe education is becoming a micro-market economy. I can believe that one day soon you will see GTWN and HRVD and BKLY listed on the NYSE. I can believe that my friends’ children will pay $200,000 to sit obediently before professors who have not opened a book for pleasure in over three years. I can believe that this won’t much matter to my friends’ children because they won’t even know what a book without an “i” in front of it is.

I am laying this path of cement where there used to be bedrock so that I can begin to accept you something much, much worse: It’s already happened. It’s not my friends’ hypothetical kids in ten years who suffer these afflictions of turn-page depravity. It’s the girl sitting next to me on the Metro and the professor you’re listening to on Wednesday night and the man in line in front of you at Starbucks and my mom’s best friend.

People do not read.

Right now, all over America, people sit, not reading.

People are listening to cars go by on the 405 not reading. Talking about bitches and bad boyfriends not reading. Climbing stairs and walking onto elevators that will take them to apartments where they will unlock their doors and not read. Settling into sheets with the remote not reading. Staring at walls not reading. Crying not reading. Feeling alone, obviously not reading. Gathering around tables carved from heavy trees and nodding solemnly and launching missiles not reading. Lying underneath other people resignedly, not reading. Hiding in caves in deserts not reading. Taking Carnival cruises not reading. Looking at blogs with pictures of shirts from J.Crew not reading. Pushing carts down aisles and standing in front of thirty brands of paper towels not reading. Walking quickly from sample cart to sample cart at Costco accepting tiny offerings not reading. Cursing as umbrellas flip inside out and getting drenched and not reading. Teaching reading and not reading.

I believe this and I believe that and I believe it all because I see and think and watch and wonder and hope and judge and get enchanted too easily and get sad too easily and get too high and mighty and feel selfish and get knocked down and get back up and at the end of all of that I read.

I believe I believe I believe. I believe we’re here now and it’s a long way past the last book that guy over there read. I believe we are endless. I believe we are a continuation of something else that was also endless. I believe we are not so very clever as all that backlit hype may have you think because never again will you find the next celebrated big thing paparazzi-target king of the world sitting in his trousers and socks, reading.

The last lauded man to find the Answer on a dogeared page has walked quietly into the night and the next one to do it won’t be lauded at all.

Move to a place that’s cold and rainy and damp and puddly and perfect for a closet full of Times New Roman, and save yourself from the dangerous and fast-approaching scourge of people for whom books are too damned real to be important. They’ll be wielding things with screens and they’ll have you before you realize it happened and by 2015 you won’t even remember that the question was to be or not to be.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.